BQ Selection offers pioneering behavioral evaluation of professional investment decision makers. Five in-depth parts result in a most comprehensive 360-degree profile. It provides objective, predictive results for behavioral performance optimization and informed selection decisions.
Who is BQ Selection for?
BQ Selection supports institutional investors and fund managers. It is used for other-evaluation in fund manager selection and due diligence. It may also be used for self-evaluation and performance optimization.
How does BQ Selection Support You?
BQ Selection supplements subjective and biased intuitions with objective, science-based data. It offers a comprehensive analysis of individual success and risk factors, decision-making style, and market approaches.
Investors invite one or more fund managers to complete the computerized behavioral interaction (other evaluation) or to complete the interaction themselves (self-evaluation).
A state-of-the-art behavioral system guides the users through five comprehensive, in-depth series of questions, scenarios and tasks.
Immediately upon completion, the results dashboard shows detailed results and comparisons. A printable report summarizes main results.
BQ Score
Overall result of the Performance Analysis
Success Score
Aspects that support performance and success
Risk Score Aspects that reduce performance and success or put them at risk
Most Pronounced Strengths
Lack of harmful emotional vulnerability. Remains confident and clear-thinking in difficult situations and under stress.
Creative thinking and acting. Preference for experimenting and inventing novel solutions, innovation, and original ideas.
Striving to make decisions based upon definite knowledge, rather than upon guesses. Systematic approach to activities and planning.
Most Pronounced Weaknesses
Tendency to gather and interpret information in a biased way that confirms already existing individual beliefs and assumptions.
Unrealistically high level of precision and tendency to see the quality of own and others’ contributions as unacceptable and flawed.
Inability to transform gathered and analyzed information into actions and decisions. Being paralyzed by doubts about the correctness of the decision.
Candidate Ranking
BQ Score
Rachel Green
Damon Holmes
Daniel Spencer
Success Factors
Risk Factors
Cookies
Wir verwenden Cookies, um unsere Website möglichst benutzerfreundlich darzustellen. Wenn Sie weiter auf unserer Website surfen, erklären Sie sich mit dem Einsatz von Cookies einverstanden. Erfahren Sie mehr über Datenschutz und Cookies.